正文 · 原文
Generating a PR with an agent is cheap now. Checking that it didn't break a user flow still takes a person and a browser.
That second job is where a lot of engineering time goes now.
@ContextQa released Ship, an AI agent that works as an automated QA engineer:
> It reads the PR > works out which user flows the change affects, and runs those flows against the deployed app. > reproduces bugs reported in Slack or Linear, finds the likely cause, and hands the evidence to a developer or a coding agent like Claude or Codex to fix.
If agents are going to ship more code, something other than a human has to exercise the result.
引用或回复的背景（作者 ID 2548584926，https://x.com/i/status/2107095904474075536）： Everyone got a coding agent. Nobody got a QA engineer.
Until today.
Meet Ship, your Autonomous Quality Engineer.
It tests deployed PRs, reproduces bugs from Slack and Linear, and hands Claude or Codex the context to fix them.
Try it free: https://t.co/iKhsWrVxu9 https://t.co/lgTklYYuwT