AINEWS Search
Back Rohan Paul (@rohanpaul_ai)
Rohan Paul (@rohanpaul_ai)· · Original publication time

Post says Google's Cogentic system used Gemini to find new proofs for five unsolved math problemsMachine translation

Automatically verified and published · Generated and evidence-checked automatically; not reviewed by a human.

AI-assisted summary

A post describing a Google paper says Cogentic has multiple agents try proof ideas in parallel, checks each step and saves verified work for later rounds. It also says most problems took about 100 model calls and human experts confirmed every proof; those results still need to be checked against the paper and expert records.

Article · Original

@Moore_Irish 🫡🫡

引用或回复的背景(作者 ID 75386705,https://x.com/i/status/2106016192985206872): @rohanpaul_ai what a pleasant friday morning reading to stumble upon today, thanks sir.

引用或回复的背景(作者 ID 2588345408,https://x.com/i/status/2105969038018892134): New Google paper reveals how Gemini found new proofs for 5 unsolved math problems.

Organize AI like a research team with strict checkers and shared notes:

A single prompt often isn't enough for hard research problems. They need many attempts, tough review, and a memory of what already worked.

Google's system, Cogentic, gives Gemini that structure. Several agents try different ideas at once, checkers assume every step is wrong until proven, and proven pieces are saved for the next round.

Most problems took only about 100 model calls, and human experts confirmed every proof.

If your agents tackle long, hard tasks, give them a strict checker and a running record of proven work, not just a better prompt.

– arxiv. org/abs/2609.40324

Title: "Cogentic: Multi-Agent Orchestration for Automated Proof Discovery"

Found an error? Send a correction